Peer Review Process

The Iranian Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (IJAA) employs a rigorous single-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of academic quality and integrity. All submitted manuscripts undergo a thorough evaluation by at least two independent experts specializing in the relevant field of astronomy and astrophysics.

 

Evaluation Criteria:

  • Originality: Reviewers assess the novelty and uniqueness of the research.
  • Scientific Rigor: The soundness of methodology, data analysis, and interpretation are evaluated.
  • Methodology: The appropriateness and effectiveness of the methods used are assessed.
  • Significance: The overall impact and contribution of the research to the field are considered.

Review Process:

  • Reviewers provide detailed and constructive feedback, highlighting strengths and potential areas for improvement.
  • Recommendations are offered to enhance the clarity, quality, and impact of the research.
  • Based on these evaluations, our editorial team makes informed decisions regarding the manuscript’s suitability for publication.

Ethical Standards:

  • All reviewers are expected to adhere to the COPE Peer Review Guidelines to maintain ethical integrity and fairness throughout the review process.
  • Authors can monitor the progress of their submissions via their accounts on the journal’s website.
  • Our editorial office is available to assist with any inquiries or concerns at every stage of submission and review.